Somewhat misleading regarding naming record types

[christerswahn]

Page URL

https://dart.dev/language/records/

Page source

https://github.com/dart-lang/site-www/tree/main/src/content/language/records.md

Describe the problem

This paragraph appears somewhat misleading:

There is no type declaration for individual record types. Records are structurally typed based on the types of their fields. A record's shape (the set of its fields, the fields' types, and their names, if any) uniquely determines the type of a record.

But it is possible to typedef a record type, and then use that type as parameter type or return type from a function for example.

This page never describes or shows with an example that a record type can be given a name for ease of use (even if a unique name will not cause records of the same shape to be distinct).

Expected fix

This could be explained better and / or shown with example with the objective to encourage easier-to-use records.

Additional context

No response

I would like to fix this problem.

• I will try and fix this problem on dart.dev.

[MiniPiku]

fixed this take ,kindly take a look
Record type misleading issue #6426