Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ORF segmentation (AUG vs non-canonical starts) #80

Open
CDieterich opened this issue Sep 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

ORF segmentation (AUG vs non-canonical starts) #80

CDieterich opened this issue Sep 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@CDieterich
Copy link

We noticed in a head-to-head comparison of ORFs
predicted with canonical and non-canonical starts
that some longer ORFs with non-canonical starts
do not have any supporting reads in the extended 5'part.

We should think about on how to deal with this.

@m-swirski
Copy link

Yes, I have seen the same thing. In fact It happens for most ORFs once alternative codons are being searched for. Are there plans to fix this?

@eboileau
Copy link
Contributor

This is on our to-do list and should be addressed soon. If you have any relevant examples, please don't hesitate to post these here.

@eboileau eboileau self-assigned this Apr 27, 2018
@m-swirski
Copy link

I have looked closer into the profiles and it seems that the problem doesn't lie in 'no reads at all' but small fraction of them compared to other potential TIS (or annotated one).

@eboileau eboileau added the priority: low Low priority issue label Dec 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants