Skip to content

Numpy 2.0.0 Compatibility #68

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Sparks29032 opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 7 comments · Fixed by #102
Closed

Numpy 2.0.0 Compatibility #68

Sparks29032 opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 7 comments · Fixed by #102

Comments

@Sparks29032
Copy link
Contributor

Sparks29032 commented Jul 4, 2024

Deprecations from numpy 2.0.0 affect this package. Fix asap.

image

@hakonanes
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all, we're currently trying to make a package depending on diffpy.structure (orix) compatible with NumPy 2.0. Do you have an idea of what it would take to make diffpy.structure compatible with 2.0?

@sbillinge
Copy link
Contributor

@hakonanes we are about ready to embark on this. We have been updating our package repository structures and bringing things up to python 3.12. We chose to pin to numpy<2 while we did that task. But it is almost finished and then we will do the numpy 2 deprecations and errors. I hope we can roll something out on the order of a week.

@hakonanes
Copy link
Contributor

hakonanes commented Sep 20, 2024

@sbillinge, that sounds fantastic, we really appreciate it.

@hakonanes
Copy link
Contributor

Hi folks, is there any timeline for when a NumPy v2-compatible release is available from PyPI and conda-forge (not an RC)?

@sbillinge
Copy link
Contributor

@hakonanes we can push that out today.

@hakonanes
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, that would be great!

@sbillinge
Copy link
Contributor

It is pushed to pypi. @bobleesj is pushing it up to conda-forge right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants