Skip to content

We should have examples of each kind of ambiguity in 6.2.5 #1294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
jskeet opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

We should have examples of each kind of ambiguity in 6.2.5 #1294

jskeet opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jskeet

Comments

@jskeet
Copy link
Contributor

jskeet commented Mar 19, 2025

When considering #1286, it would have been nice to see an example of member access to extend for the new ambiguities. Let's leave a breadcrumb trail for those who follow us.
@jskeet jskeet self-assigned this Mar 19, 2025
@jskeet
Copy link
Contributor Author

jskeet commented Mar 19, 2025

We should look at the Roslyn codebase for examples. (And Nigel's samples...)

@jskeet jskeet mentioned this issue Mar 19, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jskeet jskeet

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jskeet