Replies: 1 comment
-
There have been previous discussions about including cached_httpfs as a feature in the main httpfs extension: #88 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It's known httpfs has certain limitations, for example
You choose to copy the file into the main repo, instead of using it as a standalone dependency; my groundlessly guess you plan to make changes to the httpfs source code itself, instead of having a cache wrapper around, which makes sense to me.
So I'm wondering would you consider making it it a separate extension, so it benefits the whole community rather than just pg_duckdb.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions