Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Review DTW implementation #1296

Open
M3nin0 opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Review DTW implementation #1296

M3nin0 opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@M3nin0 @OldLipe
Labels
improvement
Milestone
version 1.5.3

Comments

@M3nin0
Copy link
Member

M3nin0 commented Feb 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Describe the requested improvement
The current implementation of DTW is slow. We should revise it to include a better version (e.g., UCR Suite).

Associated sits API function
sits_som_map and sits_segmentation

Additional context
This issue is related to the #1292
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@M3nin0 M3nin0

@OldLipe OldLipe

Labels
improvement
Projects
sits-management
Status: No status
Milestone
version 1.5.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@M3nin0 @OldLipe