Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
While formally correct, the check is also not preventing the expected behavior of the library. Consequently, it is not going to be fixed for the moment. Labeling it as an |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
💭 Would you become interested to use a development tool like “clang-tidy” for corresponding source code adjustments? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
An extra null pointer check is not needed in functions like the following.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions