|
| 1 | +# HashiCorp Vault authentication refactor |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Decision |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +We will refactor the HashiCorp Vault implementation to support the usage of different methods of authentication. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Rationale |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +The HashiCorp Vault supports multiple different authentication methods, but the current implementation supports |
| 10 | +only one and provides no way to customize or exchange authentication methods. The full list of supported |
| 11 | +methods can be found in the [HashiCorp Vault Documentation](https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth). Some examples are: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +* [Token auth method](https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth/token) (already supported) |
| 14 | +* [Kubernetes auth method](https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth/kubernetes) |
| 15 | +* [AppRole auth method](https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth/approle) |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +## Approach |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +The refactoring will be limited to the `vault-hashicorp` module. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +The common denominator among all authentication methods is the ability to provide a `client_token` for |
| 22 | +authentication against the vault. Therefore, obtaining this token will be moved to an interface. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +```java |
| 25 | +@ExtensionPoint |
| 26 | +public interface HashicorpVaultTokenProvider { |
| 27 | + String vaultToken(); |
| 28 | +} |
| 29 | +``` |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +This interface will be the extension point for downstream projects to introduce different authentication methods by |
| 32 | +providing a respective implementation of this interface to the runtime context. |
| 33 | +The [token auth method](https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/auth/token) is already supported by the current implementation and will remain the default |
| 34 | +implementation provided through the `HashicorpVaultExtension`. |
| 35 | +The respective code will therefore be moved to a class implementing `HashicorpVaultTokenProvider`. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### Services accessing the vault |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Any service that needs to access the vault will be refactored to use the `HashicorpVaultTokenProvider` for obtaining |
| 40 | +the token. Namely, affected services are: |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +* `HashicorpVault` (secure key-value store) |
| 43 | +* `HashicorpVaultSignatureService` (signing service) |
| 44 | +* `HashicorpVaultHealthService` (health check service) |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +All of these services currently get the token from the `HashicorpVaultSettings`, which will be replaced by a call to |
| 47 | +the `HashicorpVaultTokenProvider`. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### HashicorpVaultHealthService |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +In addition, the `HashicorpVaultHealthService` currently stores the headers for all requests to the vault in a |
| 52 | +class variable, which is populated once upon service instantiation. As the token, and thus the headers, |
| 53 | +may not be static for all authentication methods, the variable will be removed. Instead, the token will be fetched from |
| 54 | +the `HashicorpVaultTokenProvider` and the headers will be generated for every request. The token will therefore be |
| 55 | +added as a parameter to the `getHeaders` method. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +```java |
| 58 | +@NotNull |
| 59 | +private Headers getHeaders(String token) { |
| 60 | + var headersBuilder = new Headers.Builder().add(VAULT_REQUEST_HEADER, Boolean.toString(true)); |
| 61 | + headersBuilder.add(VAULT_TOKEN_HEADER, token); |
| 62 | + return headersBuilder.build(); |
| 63 | +} |
| 64 | +``` |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +The `HashicorpVaultHealthService` also provides methods for checking whether a token can be renewed as well as for |
| 67 | +renewing the token. As these features are not available for all authentication methods, this functionality should be |
| 68 | +moved to a different class. This part of the refactoring is already planned anyway for better separation of concerns. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +### HashicorpVaultHealthCheck |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +The `get()` method of `HashicorpVaultHealthCheck` currently returns a merged result, using the response from the |
| 73 | +health API and the response to whether the current token can be renewed. After the refactor, it is no longer |
| 74 | +guaranteed that token renewal is supported. The second check will therefore be removed from the method, which |
| 75 | +then simply returns the result of the health check. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +## Further Considerations |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +This decision record only paves the way to add additional authentication methods in the future. The actual support and |
| 80 | +implementation of any additional authentication methods is therefore out of scope of this decision record. |
0 commit comments