diff --git a/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/Log.scala b/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/Log.scala
index 19d4477..4dfb70f 100644
--- a/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/Log.scala
+++ b/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/Log.scala
@@ -11,6 +11,17 @@ import org.slf4j.{Logger, MDC}
 import scala.annotation.tailrec
 import scala.collection.immutable.SortedMap
 
+/** Named/prefixed logger instance.
+  * 
+  * Use [[LogOf]] to create the new instances of the class.
+  * 
+  * Avoid passing `Log` instances implicitly. Passing implicit instances around could "leak" a logger
+  * into an unrelated code, and create a confusion with wrongly attributed log messages.
+  * 
+  * @see [[LogOf]] for usage examples.
+  * @see [[https://slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html Logger]] for a typical
+  * underlying implementation.
+  */
 trait Log[F[_]] {
 
   @inline def trace(msg: => String): F[Unit] = trace(msg, mdc = Log.Mdc.empty)
diff --git a/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/LogOf.scala b/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/LogOf.scala
index e3b91d7..aa676de 100644
--- a/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/LogOf.scala
+++ b/core/src/main/scala/com/evolutiongaming/catshelper/LogOf.scala
@@ -8,6 +8,110 @@ import org.slf4j.{ILoggerFactory, LoggerFactory}
 
 import scala.reflect.ClassTag
 
+/** Factory of [[Log]] instances.
+  * 
+  * There are, currently, two ways of using the class and it is recommended to
+  * select one, describe it in project coding guidelines, and stick with it
+  * to avoid a confusion for the newcomers. Both ways are described below.
+  * 
+  * =Traditional approach=
+  * 
+  * The intented usage is to have a single instance of `LogOf` in the
+  * application and use it to create `Log` instances for each class.
+  *
+  * The following could be written somewhere in the application initialization
+  * code such as [[cats.effect.IOApp]] instance:
+  * {{{
+  * implicit val logOf = LogOf.slf4j[F]
+  * }}}
+  * 
+  * Then a typical example would be:
+  * {{{
+  * object UserService {
+  * 
+  *   def of[F[_]: LogOf]: F[UserService[F]] =
+  *     for {
+  *       log <- LogOf[F].forClass[UserService]
+  *       service = new UserService[F](log)
+  *     } yield service
+  * 
+  * }
+  * 
+  * class UserService[F[_]: Monad](log: Log[F]) {
+  * 
+  *  def create(user: User): F[Unit] =
+  *    for {
+  *      _ <- log.info(s"Creating user...")
+  *      _ <- ...
+  *    } yield ()
+  *   
+  * }
+  * }}}
+  * 
+  * The expected output, depending on the logging configuration, would be:
+  * {{{
+  * [2025-01-13T12:24:23.0Z] INFO UserService - Creating user...
+  * }}}
+  * 
+  * The main advantage of such approach is a minimal boilerplate when passing
+  * `LogOf` around, and an ability to reuse `LogOf` and `Log` instances,
+  * decreasing the performance overhead.
+  * 
+  * =MDC-style approach=
+  * 
+  * The alternative way to use `LogOf` is to create a child instance each time
+  * the additional information should be passed to the underlying call, making
+  * it a poor's man MDC. The additonial information is then to be passed using
+  * `withField` method on `LogOf` itself.
+  * 
+  * If `LogOf` is used in such a way, it should not be passed implicitly, to
+  * avoid accidential mix up of the `LogOf` instances.
+  * 
+  * For sake of uniformity, if this approach is used, the recommended practice
+  * is to never pass `Log` instance anywhere at all, creating a new one each
+  * time it is required. Saying that, it is acceptable to reuse them for
+  * performance or brevity reasons.
+  * 
+  * A typical example of such usage could be following:
+  * {{{
+  * class HandleService[F[_]: Monad] {
+  *
+  *   def create(logOf: LogOf[F]): F[String] =
+  *     for {
+  *       log <- logOf.forClass[HandleService]
+  *       _   <- log.info(s"Creating handle...")
+  *       _   <- ...
+  *     } yield ()
+  * 
+  * }
+  * 
+  * class UserService[F[_]: Monad](handleService: HandleService[F]) {
+  *
+  *   def create(user: User, logOf: LogOf[F]): F[Unit] =
+  *     for {
+  *       log    <- logOf.forClass[UserService]
+  *       _      <- log.info(s"Creating user...")
+  *       handle <- handleService.create(logOf.withField("user", user.id))
+  *       _      <- ...
+  *     } yield ()
+  * 
+  * }
+  * 
+  * }}}
+  * 
+  * The expected output, depending on the logging configuration, would be:
+  * {{{
+  * [2025-01-13T12:24:23.0Z] INFO UserService - Creating user...
+  * [2025-01-13T12:24:23.0Z] INFO HandleService user=n32fkj43asxa45ak - Creating handle...
+  * }}}
+  * 
+  * This approach introduces a slight overhead, because it requires creating
+  * both `LogOf` and `Log` instances on each call, but allows passing an
+  * additional context to the called methods.
+  * 
+  * @see [[https://slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/LoggerFactory.html LoggerFactory]]
+  * for a typical underlying implementation.
+  */
 trait LogOf[F[_]] {
 
   def apply(source: String): F[Log[F]]