Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create an implementation of FediverseNode that acts as a gRPC client #95

Closed
jernst opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Create an implementation of FediverseNode that acts as a gRPC client #95

jernst opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Milestone
FediTest 0.4 rele...

Comments

@jernst
Copy link
Member

jernst commented May 9, 2024

Similar to #94, that would enable any Fediverse application, not just those implementing the Mastodon client API, to participate in FediTest automation.

gRPC seems to be the protocol of choice.

We don't really need a server implementation, just know how to get to the generated interfaces in various languages.
@jernst jernst mentioned this issue May 15, 2024
Closed
@steve-bate steve-bate added the enhancement New feature or request label May 17, 2024
@jernst jernst added this to the FediTest 0.3 released milestone Jun 18, 2024
@jernst jernst mentioned this issue Jul 10, 2024
Open
@jernst jernst added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jul 10, 2024
@jernst
Copy link
Member Author

jernst commented Jul 10, 2024

Based on trying this out, it can be done but it comes with enough of a learning curve that the goal of making it easy to connect a new application is not being reached. Instead let's do #215.

@jernst jernst closed this as completed Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
FediTest 0.4 released
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@steve-bate @jernst