From bfdfc451138ccdd0a8149df4fb62bfac63ba5a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mitchell Robert Vollger Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 06:45:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ont --- src/analyses/ont.md | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/analyses/ont.md b/src/analyses/ont.md index 5d74589..8a9be34 100644 --- a/src/analyses/ont.md +++ b/src/analyses/ont.md @@ -1,14 +1,24 @@ # ONT Fiber-seq Analysis +## Matched ONT and PacBio preparations ![](../images/figures/ONT/1.png) +## Read lengths unchanged by Fiber-seq ![](../images/figures/ONT/2.png) +## Impact of Fiber-seq on ONT read quality ![](../images/figures/ONT/3.png) +## A comparison of ONT and PacBio Fiber-seq ![](../images/figures/ONT/4.png) ![](../images/figures/ONT/5.png) +## Genome-wide comparison of ONT and PacBio Fiber-seq ![](../images/figures/ONT/6.png) +## Transcription factor foot printing has reduced resolution with ONT ![](../images/figures/ONT/7.png) +## Stand does not significantly impact ONT Fiber-seq FIRE results ![](../images/figures/ONT/8.png) +## ONT FIREs have ~half as many m6A sites as PacBio (as expected) ![](../images/figures/ONT/9.png) +## Auto-correlation of m6A sites in ONT nearly matches a single strand of PacBio ![](../images/figures/ONT/10.png) +## Overall conclusions ![](../images/figures/ONT/11.png)