Problem
Managing feature flags would be challenging when different use cases require some form of distinction:
- release flags
- permanent flags
- experimental flags
- etc.
On the Flags overview, it is currently not possible to visually group or organize these different use cases.
Ideal Solution
Ideally, there should be a functionality to further organize feature flags within a namespace, via e.g. groups or tags. Preferable from my end would be tags because I could then tag lifecycle stage (qa, live, sunset, obsolete, etc.)
Search
Additional Context
Current workaround
The current workaround would be to prefix feature flag keys with some identifiers, e.g. tmp-.
Problem
Managing feature flags would be challenging when different use cases require some form of distinction:
On the Flags overview, it is currently not possible to visually group or organize these different use cases.
Ideal Solution
Ideally, there should be a functionality to further organize feature flags within a namespace, via e.g. groups or tags. Preferable from my end would be tags because I could then tag lifecycle stage (qa, live, sunset, obsolete, etc.)
Search
Additional Context
Current workaround
The current workaround would be to prefix feature flag keys with some identifiers, e.g.
tmp-.