You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On the treatment of the sui generis database rights in Version
3.0 of the Creative Commons licenses.
Background:
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal
protection of databases (the "Database Directive") created a new basis for the protection of
databases ("'sui generis database protection") not previously recognized under copyright law. The
database directive has by now been implemented by the 25 member states of the EU (plus some
of the countries such as Norvway that are part of the European Economic Area - EEA). Outside of
Europe there is no sui generis protection of Databases. In some countries (for example Germany)
the database directive has been implemented as part of the national copyright act, while others
(such as the Netherlands) have chosen to implement via a separate act (in this case the database
act).
The lawmakers of the European Union decided that in order to provide greater
protection to collections of information they should have a unified legal protection for
databases. To this end, they created a sui gerneris right called database right. The
database right lasts for 15 years under this regime, but can be extended if the
database is updated. Database rights prevent copying of substantial parts of a
database (including frequent extraction of insubstantial parts). However unlike
copyright the protection of the database right is not over the form of expression of
information but of the information itself [source: en.wikipedia.org/wikiDatabase rights].
Prior to Version 3.0, some localized and translated versions of the Creative Commons licenses
(Belgium, Netherlands, France and Germany) contained references to national legislation passed
pursuant to the Database Directive, by defining a "work" to include databases protected by these
laws. Most other European CC licenses simply did not mention database rights at all. This situation
was identified as one of the issues in need of harmonization as part of the upgrade cycle to version
3.0. As this problem was identified at a relatively late point in the upgrade cycle it was not included
in the public consultation process that preceded the launch of the 3.0 licenses.
At this point some project leads have expressed the view that the EU sui generis rights may be so
broad that the CC licenses are not complete (or exercisable) in practical applications (particularly
in internet collections) without addressing them (without this the licensor of these works would still
hold some exclusive rights in the works they intended to license).
On the other hand, database licensing is particularly problematic in pure data contexts (.e.,
beyond the scope of copyright), and in the past, CC (through Science Commons) had decided to
refrain from creating data licenses. CC licenses that include the sui generis database rights are
especialy problematic from the perspective of Science Commons as they pose the danger that the
sui generis protection of databases could "be exported' to a jurisdiction without sui generis
protection of databases through the use of CC licenses for works that qualify for protection under
the various national implementations of the Database Directive. From the perspective of Science
Commons this made CC licenses that define 'works' to include databases protected by the national
implementations of the Database Directive unsuitable for use in the scientific context.
Creative Commons version 3.0 - sui generis database rights language (Paul Keller / Catharina Maracke) - Aug 15, 2007
1/3
cCreative
Commons
Solution:
This meant that order for CC licenses to be fully functional in European jurisdictions the
database rights need to be included, while at the same time the inclusion of these rights
disqualified them for use in scientific context. In order to overcome this blockade three principles
have been established:
Existing Legislation: Sui generis database rights should only be included in localizations
where the country has enacted legislation to implement database protection.
Geographic Boundary: CC licenses that define 'works' to include databases protected by the
national implementations of the Database Directive should have territorial limitations regarding
these rights.
Unconditional Waiver: Those CC licenses that define 'works' to include databases protected
by the national implementations of the Database Directive should also waive the rights
obtained under the sui generis right (i.e not impose any of the CC license limitations or
obligations (BY-SA-ND-NC). In other words, the sui generis license should not extend the
restrictions of the CC license conditions to things (facts, ideas, information, etc.) not protected
by copyright.
The waiver also clarifies that restrictions and obligations such as attribution, non-commercial, no
derivatives, and share-alike are not applicable to works, or to the exercise of particular rights, that
are only protected by virtue of sui generis database protection. In other words, the only basis for
such restrictions and obligations will continue to be traditional copyright principles.
Implementation:
In the legal code of the licenses this is implemented in three different places (the examples below
show the English retranslation from the Dutch 3.0 licenses):
Inclusion of the sui generis database rights in the definition of work (section 1 of the
licenses). This section also contains wording that implements the above mentioned territorial
limitation:
Work: the work protected by copyight law that is offered under the terms of this
license. For the application of this license a work must also be taken to mean a
phonogram, a videogram or a (broadcast)programme within the meaning of the
Neighboring Rights Act and a database within the meaning of the Databank Act,
provided that such phonogram, videogram, (broadcast)programme or database is
protected by applicable law in Your jurisdiction."
Creative Commons version 3.0 - sui generis database rights language (Paul Keller / Catharina Maracke) - Aug 15, 2007
2/3
c)Creative
commons
Unconditional waiver of the of the sui generis database rights under the national law
implementing the European Database Directive at the end of section 3 of the licenses:
Where the licensor is the owner of the sui generis database rights under the national
law implementing the European Database Directive, the licensor will waive this right.
Clarification of this waiver in section 4 (directly after the subsections covering the restrictions
(SA, BY, NC) but above the subsections dealing with moral rights and collecting societies/
compulsory licensing schemes:
For the avoidance of doubt: The restrictions mentioned above (4(a) and 4(b)) do not
apply to those parts of the work considered to fall within the definition of a "work" under
this license exclusively because they meet the criteria of the sui generis database right
under the national law implementing the European Database Directive.
Creative Commons version 3.0 - sui generis database rights lanquage (Paul Keller / Catharina Maracke) - Aug 15. 2O07
3/3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
co)Sreative
Commons
On the treatment of the sui generis database rights in Version
3.0 of the Creative Commons licenses.
Background:
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal
protection of databases (the "Database Directive") created a new basis for the protection of
databases ("'sui generis database protection") not previously recognized under copyright law. The
database directive has by now been implemented by the 25 member states of the EU (plus some
of the countries such as Norvway that are part of the European Economic Area - EEA). Outside of
Europe there is no sui generis protection of Databases. In some countries (for example Germany)
the database directive has been implemented as part of the national copyright act, while others
(such as the Netherlands) have chosen to implement via a separate act (in this case the database
act).
The lawmakers of the European Union decided that in order to provide greater
protection to collections of information they should have a unified legal protection for
databases. To this end, they created a sui gerneris right called database right. The
database right lasts for 15 years under this regime, but can be extended if the
database is updated. Database rights prevent copying of substantial parts of a
database (including frequent extraction of insubstantial parts). However unlike
copyright the protection of the database right is not over the form of expression of
information but of the information itself [source: en.wikipedia.org/wikiDatabase rights].
Prior to Version 3.0, some localized and translated versions of the Creative Commons licenses
(Belgium, Netherlands, France and Germany) contained references to national legislation passed
pursuant to the Database Directive, by defining a "work" to include databases protected by these
laws. Most other European CC licenses simply did not mention database rights at all. This situation
was identified as one of the issues in need of harmonization as part of the upgrade cycle to version
3.0. As this problem was identified at a relatively late point in the upgrade cycle it was not included
in the public consultation process that preceded the launch of the 3.0 licenses.
At this point some project leads have expressed the view that the EU sui generis rights may be so
broad that the CC licenses are not complete (or exercisable) in practical applications (particularly
in internet collections) without addressing them (without this the licensor of these works would still
hold some exclusive rights in the works they intended to license).
On the other hand, database licensing is particularly problematic in pure data contexts (.e.,
beyond the scope of copyright), and in the past, CC (through Science Commons) had decided to
refrain from creating data licenses. CC licenses that include the sui generis database rights are
especialy problematic from the perspective of Science Commons as they pose the danger that the
sui generis protection of databases could "be exported' to a jurisdiction without sui generis
protection of databases through the use of CC licenses for works that qualify for protection under
the various national implementations of the Database Directive. From the perspective of Science
Commons this made CC licenses that define 'works' to include databases protected by the national
implementations of the Database Directive unsuitable for use in the scientific context.
Creative Commons version 3.0 - sui generis database rights language (Paul Keller / Catharina Maracke) - Aug 15, 2007
1/3
cCreative
Commons
Solution:
This meant that order for CC licenses to be fully functional in European jurisdictions the
database rights need to be included, while at the same time the inclusion of these rights
disqualified them for use in scientific context. In order to overcome this blockade three principles
have been established:
Existing Legislation: Sui generis database rights should only be included in localizations
where the country has enacted legislation to implement database protection.
Geographic Boundary: CC licenses that define 'works' to include databases protected by the
national implementations of the Database Directive should have territorial limitations regarding
these rights.
Unconditional Waiver: Those CC licenses that define 'works' to include databases protected
by the national implementations of the Database Directive should also waive the rights
obtained under the sui generis right (i.e not impose any of the CC license limitations or
obligations (BY-SA-ND-NC). In other words, the sui generis license should not extend the
restrictions of the CC license conditions to things (facts, ideas, information, etc.) not protected
by copyright.
The waiver also clarifies that restrictions and obligations such as attribution, non-commercial, no
derivatives, and share-alike are not applicable to works, or to the exercise of particular rights, that
are only protected by virtue of sui generis database protection. In other words, the only basis for
such restrictions and obligations will continue to be traditional copyright principles.
Implementation:
In the legal code of the licenses this is implemented in three different places (the examples below
show the English retranslation from the Dutch 3.0 licenses):
licenses). This section also contains wording that implements the above mentioned territorial
limitation:
Work: the work protected by copyight law that is offered under the terms of this
license. For the application of this license a work must also be taken to mean a
phonogram, a videogram or a (broadcast)programme within the meaning of the
Neighboring Rights Act and a database within the meaning of the Databank Act,
provided that such phonogram, videogram, (broadcast)programme or database is
protected by applicable law in Your jurisdiction."
Creative Commons version 3.0 - sui generis database rights language (Paul Keller / Catharina Maracke) - Aug 15, 2007
2/3
c)Creative
commons
implementing the European Database Directive at the end of section 3 of the licenses:
Where the licensor is the owner of the sui generis database rights under the national
law implementing the European Database Directive, the licensor will waive this right.
(SA, BY, NC) but above the subsections dealing with moral rights and collecting societies/
compulsory licensing schemes:
For the avoidance of doubt: The restrictions mentioned above (4(a) and 4(b)) do not
apply to those parts of the work considered to fall within the definition of a "work" under
this license exclusively because they meet the criteria of the sui generis database right
under the national law implementing the European Database Directive.
Creative Commons version 3.0 - sui generis database rights lanquage (Paul Keller / Catharina Maracke) - Aug 15. 2O07
3/3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: