Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Update JavaScript SDKs to v9.0.0 #1072

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

feat: Update JavaScript SDKs to v9.0.0 #1072

merged 19 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

timfish
Copy link
Collaborator

@timfish timfish commented Jan 28, 2025

This PR updates to v9 of the JavaScript SDKs and prepares the Electron SDK for a new major version

  • Remove all deprecated types/APIs
  • Remove deprecated Electron versions
    • Remove code to support breakpad
  • Cater for API changes
    • autoSessionTracking removed
    • netBreadcrumbsIntegration tracing headers simplification
    • Combine Electron and Node childProcessIntegration
  • user.ipaddress = "{{auto}}" using helpers
  • Migration guide

@timfish timfish marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2025 20:21
@timfish timfish changed the title feat: v6 feat: Update JavaScript SDKs to v9.0.0 Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Lms24 Lms24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Tim! Reads like it's a smooth upgrade 🚀

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
Comment on lines 5 to 9
## 6.0.0

This release updates the underlying Sentry JavaScript SDKs to v9 which includes some breaking changes. Check out the the [migration guide](./MIGRATION.md) for more details.


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given this will be added to the GH release and hence to dependabot PRs: Do you think there's anything that we should point out in the changelog specifically?

Thinking of the supported Electron versions and maybe the session stuff. Happy to let you make the cal but just wanted to double-check.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, good point!

@timfish timfish merged commit 4a7798a into master Feb 11, 2025
34 checks passed
@timfish timfish deleted the feat/v6 branch February 11, 2025 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants