Actions: github/codeql-coding-standards
Actions
233 workflow runs
233 workflow runs
M0-1-10
: Generates lot of false positives for used functions
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#340:
Issue comment #711 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
A2-7-3
: documented type alias to template instantiation considered undocumented
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#338:
Issue comment #709 (comment)
created
by
fjatWbyT
A2-7-3
: Certain using
declarations are wrongly considered undocumented.
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#337:
Issue comment #398 (comment)
created
by
fjatWbyT
M0-1-10
: Generates lot of false positives for used functions
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#336:
Issue comment #711 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M0-1-10
: Generates lot of false positives for used functions
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#335:
Issue comment #711 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
M3-4-1
: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#330:
Issue comment #665 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
A1-1-2
: does not understand -Wno-* flags
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#329:
Issue comment #689 (comment)
created
by
MichaelRFairhurst
M3-4-1
: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#327:
Issue comment #665 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M3-4-1
: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#323:
Issue comment #665 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
constexpr
integer is used in array size
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#322:
Issue comment #690 (comment)
created
by
fjatWbyT
M0-1-9
: constexpr used in array size is detected as dead code
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#321:
Issue comment #678 (comment)
created
by
fjatWbyT
M0-1-9
: constexpr used in array size is detected as dead code
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#320:
Issue comment #678 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M3-4-1
: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
🤖 Run Matrix Check (On Comment)
#319:
Issue comment #665 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh