Actions: github/codeql-coding-standards
Actions
233 workflow runs
233 workflow runs
PRE32-C
: Raises false positives when a file has a function call and a preprocessor directive at any location.
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1891:
Issue comment #650 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
PRE32-C
: Raises false positives when a file has a function call and a preprocessor directive at any location.
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1890:
Issue comment #650 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1889:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1888:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1887:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
A8-5-2
: Reports a violation even for correctly initialized variables as per the rule
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1886:
Issue comment #645 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1885:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1884:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1883:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M0-1-10
: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called"
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1882:
Issue comment #646 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
A8-5-2
: Reports a violation even for correctly initialized variables as per the rule
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1881:
Issue comment #645 (comment)
created
by
rak3-sh
A8-5-2
: Reports a violation even for correctly initialized variables as per the rule
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1880:
Issue comment #645 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A13-3-1
: Ignore false overloads with the same parameter type
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1877:
Issue comment #406 (comment)
created
by
knewbury01
A7-1-7
: Exclude anonymous structs
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1876:
Issue comment #630 (comment)
created
by
knewbury01
A3-9-1
: Ignore use of int
in operator increment/decrement
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1873:
Issue comment #614 (comment)
created
by
jokerputihboy
A7-1-7
: Avoid reporting the same expression or declaration in multiple template instantiations
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1872:
Issue comment #383 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
A7-1-7
: Avoid reporting the same expression or declaration in multiple template instantiations
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1871:
Issue comment #383 (comment)
created
by
lcartey
M0-2-1
: Consider array copies with overlapping data
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1869:
Issue comment #119 (comment)
created
by
knewbury01
M0-1-9
: Wrong dead code detection on function templates
🏁 Run Release Performance Check
#1868:
Issue comment #604 (comment)
created
by
lcartey