Java nested lambdas formatting is incredibly poor

[kberezin-nshl]

I already posted a comment: #137 (comment)
but it was ignored.

Duplicating here.

Elasticsearch API. What I would like to have:

      var hits =
          elasticsearchClient
              .search(r -> r.index(indexName)
                  .query(q -> q.bool(
                      b -> b
                          .must(job -> job.match(t -> t.field("job_id").query(jobId)))
                          .must(str -> str.queryString(
                              qs -> qs.query("\"%s\"".formatted(searchString))))))
                  .size(request.getPageSize()),
                  Doc.class);

what I get:

      var hits =
          elasticsearchClient
              .search(
                  r ->
                      r.index(indexName)
                          .query(
                              q ->
                                  q.bool(
                                      b ->
                                          b.must(
                                                  job ->
                                                      job.match(
                                                          t -> t.field("job_id").query(jobId)))
                                              .must(
                                                  str ->
                                                      str.queryString(
                                                          qs ->
                                                              qs.query(
                                                                  "\"%s\""
                                                                      .formatted(searchString))))))
                          .size(request.getPageSize()),
                  Doc.class);

[cushon]

This is a duplicate of #137

[kberezin-nshl]

How is this a duplicate, @cushon?

This is an issue with the formatter. It expands a 7-8 line long code into 15-20 long code.
I am not asking to switch the formatter off here, I am asking to reconsider the formatter's Java lambda support.

[cushon]

That was the wrong bug number, I meant #19.