step-06, OperationError: Failed to set local offer sdp

[druuu]

when trying to connect to an existing room, the following error occurs

main.js:414 OperationError: Failed to set local offer sdp: Failed to push down transport description for data: Local fingerprint does not match identity. Expected: sha-256 CB:4E:B5:25:34:E5:3B:22:71:15:0B:53:43:BF:22:A8:67:51:79:A0:B4:DD:5F:F8:46:1B:9C:95:46:54:E2:EE Got: sha-256 26:36:B2:06:96:84:97:6B:EA:58:72:C6:70:7B:B9:D1:29:07:C3:BD:04:E3:8C:0C:21:3B:A1:4E:43:92:96:B3 DOMException: Failed to set local offer sdp: Failed to push down transport description for data: Local fingerprint does not match identity. Expected: sha-256 CB:4E:B5:25:34:E5:3B:22:71:15:0B:53:43:BF:22:A8:67:51:79:A0:B4:DD:5F:F8:46:1B:9C:95:46:54:E2:EE Got: sha-256 26:36:B2:06:96:84:97:6B:EA:58:72:C6:70:7B:B9:D1:29:07:C3:BD:04:E3:8C:0C:21:3B:A1:4E:43:92:96:B3 logError @ main.js:414 main.js:414 OperationError: Session error code: ERROR_CONTENT. Session error description: Failed to push down transport description for data: Local fingerprint does not match identity. Expected: sha-256 CB:4E:B5:25:34:E5:3B:22:71:15:0B:53:43:BF:22:A8:67:51:79:A0:B4:DD:5F:F8:46:1B:9C:95:46:54:E2:EE Got: sha-256 26:36:B2:06:96:84:97:6B:EA:58:72:C6:70:7B:B9:D1:29:07:C3:BD:04:E3:8C:0C:21:3B:A1:4E:43:92:96:B3. DOMException: Session error code: ERROR_CONTENT. Session error description: Failed to push down transport description for data: Local fingerprint does not match identity. Expected: sha-256 CB:4E:B5:25:34:E5:3B:22:71:15:0B:53:43:BF:22:A8:67:51:79:A0:B4:DD:5F:F8:46:1B:9C:95:46:54:E2:EE Got: sha-256 26:36:B2:06:96:84:97:6B:EA:58:72:C6:70:7B:B9:D1:29:07:C3:BD:04:E3:8C:0C:21:3B:A1:4E:43:92:96:B3. logError @ main.js:414

for more details: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/discuss-webrtc/y36jBwPeuv0

workaround
remove: https://github.com/googlecodelabs/webrtc-web/blob/master/step-06/index.js#L45

[nitobuendia]

@druuu Thank you Dinesh for reporting the issue and proposing a solution. Do you want to send a PR and I can review it? The proposed change makes sense a priori and I am happy to have a look. If you are not willing, happy to take on the PR too.

PS: This feels the same as #85.

[druuu]

created pr #89