Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
![]() also facing some issues, getting black images |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That script belongs to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Could you please shed some light on the dataset you're using? Since it involves somewhat large-scale training, I won't be able to try things out myself. So, will try my best to provide some suggestions. What happens when you try to overfit a single batch? Like do you see similar validation behavior, then? Also, on Step 1050, I see that the first two rows generate decent results but the final one doesn't. Have you tried evaluating that checkpoint in isolation on different images and seen anything weird? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @sayakpaul, thanks for the reply. Actually I don't need to use the script in research project. The script in the However, I was reading the script and realise that the The micro conditioning on image size is implemented here:
Therefore, am I right to assume that we should add the micro conditioning on image sizes as well? This means we need to track the crop coordinates and original size here before computing embeddings. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi could please provide your script using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Describe the bug
I am using the webdataset sdxl controlnet training script.
I ran the script two times with 2 different learning rates in which both runs gave unexpected generated validation images:
LR = 5e-5
Step 1050

Step 1100

LR = 4e-4
Step 50

Step 100

I understand this webdataset script differs from the example script in 2 ways:
crops_coords_top_left_h
andcrops_coords_top_left_w
Therefore, is the generated validation images expected as part of the training process?
Reproduction
These are my parameters:
Logs
No response
System Info
Diffusers v0.29.1
Who can help?
@sayakpaul @dn
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions