Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ambiguous use of term state-triples in ACS construction #347

Open
yogeshbdeshpande opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #392
Open

Ambiguous use of term state-triples in ACS construction #347

yogeshbdeshpande opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #392
Assignees
@yogeshbdeshpande
Labels
mustfix This is essential requirement for CoRIM Publish

Comments

@yogeshbdeshpande
Copy link
Collaborator

In the Verifier processing,the draft text states that Evidence is represented as state-triples

However, there is no internal representation expressing Evidence as state-triples.

This part of the text needs to be re-visited..
@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande changed the title Ambiguous use of term state-triples in the Internal Representation (ACS) Ambiguous use of term state-triples in ACS construction Nov 11, 2024
@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande self-assigned this Feb 12, 2025
@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande added the mustfix This is essential requirement for CoRIM Publish label Feb 12, 2025
@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande linked a pull request Feb 20, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@yogeshbdeshpande yogeshbdeshpande

Labels
mustfix This is essential requirement for CoRIM Publish
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Corim cleanup ietf-rats-wg/draft-ietf-rats-corim
1 participant
@yogeshbdeshpande