You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
lizard 2.1 -39
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1766/1091=1.61x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1968/1150=1.71x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1267/650=1.94x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 2532/1481=1.70x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1347/877=1.53x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 2925/2235=1.30x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
The brutally fast Oodle and LZTurbo are missing, one day when open-sourced they will redefine the roster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's interesting lzav -2 is on par or outperforms zlib -9 on larger files. lzav is pure LZ77, and its compression algorithms were tuned for speed, so its stream format can probably be utilized even better.
Hopefully there are no issues with benchmarking. lzav -2 decompressing faster than lzav -1 is a bit suspicious to me.
As far as Oodle and LZTurbo go, we'll probably never know if they are actually faster than lzsse2 on decompression. These are commercial algorithms and advertised benchmarks may not be reliable. I do not think they'll be open-sourced ever.
Testmachine: ThinkPad L490, i7-8565U, DDR4 2400 MHz
OS: Linux Fedora 39
Mode: Performance Mode, as superuser
Compiler: gcc version 13.2.1 20231205 (Red Hat 13.2.1-6) (GCC)
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
lizard 2.1 -39
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1766/1091=1.61x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1968/1150=1.71x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1267/650=1.94x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 2532/1481=1.70x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 1347/877=1.53x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
TOP 3 Pareto frontiers (compressors for which no other compressors BOTH compress smaller and decompress faster):
zstd 1.5.6 -22
nakamichi okamigan
lzsse2 2019-04-18 -17
'Wolfeye' is 2925/2235=1.30x faster-but-weaker than zstd.
The brutally fast Oodle and LZTurbo are missing, one day when open-sourced they will redefine the roster.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: