Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with comapre_pathways #89

Open
Achiraa opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Issue with comapre_pathways #89

Achiraa opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@Achiraa
Copy link

Achiraa commented Jan 17, 2025

> bm_neu[[i]] <- compare_pathways(list(marrow), pathways)

ERROR
Using single core processing. Specify 'parallel = TRUE' and cores = x arguments for parallel processing

Cell numbers in population 1 = 1107

  • If greater than 500 cells, these populations will be downsampled

Excluding 1081 pathway(s) based on min/max genes parameter: BIOCARTA_ACE2_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_ACETAMINOPHEN_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_ACH_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_ACTINY_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_AGPCR_PATHWAY...

Calculating pathway fold changes...

Performing a two-sample analysis with SCPA...
0%Error in if (lowerpval < level) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed

@jackbibby1
Copy link
Owner

Hi.

It looks like you're only supplying one population in marrow. You need to supply 2 or more populations for the comparison to run.

Jack

@Achiraa
Copy link
Author

Achiraa commented Jan 17, 2025

But when I did for Blood it worked perfectly.

> bl_neu[[i]] <- compare_pathways(list(blood), pathways)

Using single core processing. Specify 'parallel = TRUE' and cores = x arguments for parallel processing

Cell numbers in population 1 = 403

  • If greater than 500 cells, these populations will be downsampled

Excluding 1081 pathway(s) based on min/max genes parameter: BIOCARTA_ACE2_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_ACETAMINOPHEN_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_ACH_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_ACTINY_PATHWAY, BIOCARTA_AGPCR_PATHWAY...

Calculating pathway fold changes...

Performing a two-sample analysis with SCPA...
|==================================================| 100%

@jackbibby1
Copy link
Owner

Can you give me the code you're using to generate the blood and marrow objects?

@Achiraa
Copy link
Author

Achiraa commented Jan 17, 2025

setwd("C:/Users/S236282/Desktop/Itaconate data/CellChat/Pathway Analysis")

library(SCPA)
library(msigdbr)
library(Seurat)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(multicross)

data_all <- readRDS("C:/Users/S236282/Desktop/Itaconate data/CellChat/seurat_annotation.rds")

head([email protected])

DimPlot(data_all) +
theme(aspect.ratio = 1)

Visualize the data colored by tissue and location type

DimPlot(data_all, group.by = "type", split.by = "batch", ncol = 3) +
theme(aspect.ratio = 1) +
ggtitle("DimPlot Day 3: All Cell types within BM, BL, HO")

define all the pathways that we want to use

pws <- c("kegg", "reactome", "biocarta", "wiki", "pid")
pathways <- msigdbr("Mus musculus") %>%
filter(grepl(paste(pws, collapse = "|"), gs_subcat, ignore.case = T) |
grepl("HALLMARK", x = gs_name, ignore.case = T)) %>%
format_pathways()

#Data prep
cell_types <- unique(data_all$type)
split_location <- SplitObject(data_all, split.by = "batch")

#Pathway analysis across location

We first create empty lists to store results from the for loop

bl_neu <- list(); bm_neu <- list(); ho_neu <- list()

We extract expression data using seurat_extract based on location and cell type

Loop over cell types and only run analysis for "Neu"

for (i in cell_types) {
# Extract expression data for neutrophils across locations
blood <- seurat_extract(split_location$Blood, meta1 = "type", value_meta1 = "Neu")
marrow <- seurat_extract(split_location$Marrow, meta1 = "type", value_meta1 = "Neu")
ho <- seurat_extract(split_location$HO, meta1 = "type", value_meta1 = "Neu")

# Perform pathway comparisons for neutrophils
result_bl <- compare_pathways(list(blood), pathways)
result_bm <- compare_pathways(list(marrow[1:500,]), pathways)
result_ho <- compare_pathways(list(ho), pathways)

}

View(result_bl)

Image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants