Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
|
There's some work on it: #1017 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
IPv6 basic support will be in the next version. Please see #1950 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I work in the industry, who actually uses IP6? IP6 is more of a I wish it was used. I don't think it's usage is going to "sneak up on you" at this rate. Even for UDP transfer software, like Riverbed, IP4 seems fine. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was looking through the code, and also read somewhere on the site that IPv6 wasn't currently supported.
Seems it could resolve a lot of legacy NAT issues that prevent some from running a server due to ISP limitations.
Is IPv6 support on the roadmap?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions