Release fixes

[FBartos]

fixes: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-test-release/issues/2806
fixes: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-test-release/issues/2807
fixes: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-test-release/issues/2810
fixes: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-test-release/issues/2811

[boutinb]

The https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-test-release/issues/2807 still fails

[FBartos]

The jasp-stats/jasp-test-release#2807 still fails

well, you cannot untick the intercept, so you cannot reproduce the error in other way than loading the data set :)

[RensDofferhoff]

@boutinb @FBartos should I just alter the datalib files by checking intercept?

[FBartos]

I think the data lib files do have checked intercept -- this error occurred once the intercept was unchecked

[boutinb]

think the data lib files do have checked intercept -- this error occurred once the intercept was unchecked

I'm not sure to understand: if I load a csv file, I add the Bayesian Linear Mixed Model, I set a dependent variable, a fixed effects and a Random effect, and then unset the 'Include intercept': i get this error.
If I do that with the Classical Linear Mixed Model, I don't get any error.
In 0.19.1, we have the same problem.
If in the Bayesian version, the Intercept must be always set, then let's disable it.

[FBartos]

I'm not sure to understand: if I load a csv file, I add the Bayesian Linear Mixed Model, I set a dependent variable, a fixed effects and a Random effect, and then unset the 'Include intercept': i get this error.
If I do that with the Classical Linear Mixed Model, I don't get any error.
In 0.19.1, we have the same problem.
If in the Bayesian version, the Intercept must be always set, then let's disable it.

Yes, indeed, that's what this PR does
https://github.com/jasp-stats/jaspMixedModels/pull/193/files#diff-8d00a9863284d8353ec247264278f6a683e47ede754168d1eeec45cab4150ea9R66-R69
and
https://github.com/jasp-stats/jaspMixedModels/pull/193/files#diff-b24bbd7477efa6362f979b53402ed5a9a0a9939bd5f3271f0e0f03f5731a5b8aR51-R54

[boutinb]

Ok, then we can merge this, @RensDofferhoff ?

[RensDofferhoff]

Yes