Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master'

Author: sanex3339

App/containers/OptionsContainer.js

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ const Options = ({dispatch, options}) =>
                     <Divider/>
 
                     <Form.Checkbox
-                        label='Control Flow Flatteing'
+                        label='Control Flow Flattening'
                         checked={options.controlFlowFlattening}
                         onChange={() => dispatch(actions.toggleOption(types.TOGGLE_CONTROL_FLOW_FLATTENING))}/>
 

templates/index.html

@@ -89,17 +89,17 @@ <h3>What is this?</h3>
             functionality of the original code.</p>
     </div>
     <div class="column">
-        <h3>So, like UglifyJS, Closure Compiler, etc?</h3>
+        <h3>So, it is like UglifyJS, Closure Compiler, etc?</h3>
         <p>Yes and no. While UglifyJS (and others minifiers) does make the output code harder to understand
             (compressed and ugly), it can be easily be transformed into something readable using a JS
             Beautifier.</p>
         <p>This tool prevents that by using various transformations and "traps", such as
             <strong>self-defending</strong> and <strong>debug protection</strong>.</p>
     </div>
     <div class="column">
-        <h3>How does the obfuscation works?</h3>
-        <p>Through a series of transformations, such as variable / function / arguments renaming, strings removal,
-            and others, your source code is transformed into something unreadable, while working exatcly as
+        <h3>How does the obfuscation work?</h3>
+        <p>Through a series of transformations, such as variable / function / arguments renaming, string removal,
+            and others, your source code is transformed into something unreadable, while working exactly as
             before.</p>
         <p><a href="#FAQ">Read more in the FAQ...</a></p>
     </div>