Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion for Release Naming Convention #285

Open
drego85 opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Suggestion for Release Naming Convention #285

drego85 opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@drego85
Copy link
Contributor

drego85 commented Jan 2, 2025

Hi,
I would like to propose an improvement to the naming convention of the release version for Pwnagotchi.

Currently, any Pwnagotchi version is released with names like pwnagotchi-64bit.img.xz. I believe that including the released version in the file name could make it easier for users to quickly identify which version they are downloading.

For example, I suggest changing the file name format to something like pwnagotchi-64bit_2.9.4.img.xz, where 2.9.4 represents the specific release version. This change could enhance usability and reduce confusion, especially for users who may need to download specific versions for compatibility or testing purposes.

Thank you for considering this proposal!

@drego85 drego85 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 2, 2025
@jayofelony
Copy link
Owner

Yes it got lost at some point, I've been forgetting that.

@SgtStarSlayer
Copy link

not to throw a wrench in your update process, not sure if the ups 1.3 plugin is working properly. not getting a reading at all. it was working back in 2.8.3 for a short period then just stopped. back then i just jumped on that iteration.

@MimoAW
Copy link

MimoAW commented Jan 22, 2025

not to throw a wrench in your update process, not sure if the ups 1.3 plugin is working properly. not getting a reading at all. it was working back in 2.8.3 for a short period then just stopped. back then i just jumped on that iteration.

What version are you on?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants