You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Same for this set of 555 numbers. Every one of these is reserved for "example" phone numbers, to be used in movies, for instance. They will never be a working number.
Numbers matching the following pattern are usually fake because movies tend to stray outside of the officially reserved +1 (???) 555-01?? zone, but I read that some areas which have run out of other numbers have begun to use them. I've never seen it in real life.
+1 (???) 555-????
The following number is for directory assistance. It will never be a real user's phone number.
+1 (???) 555-1212
You may find that the last two examples are outside of the scope of phony_rails and should be handled by the application. But all other examples should return false when calling plausible_number?.
Thank you for your consideration!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
plausible_number? returns true for these, but they are invalid:
+1 (?11) ???-????
+1 (???) ?11-????
+1 (???) 1??-????
+1 (???) 0??-????
Same for this set of 555 numbers. Every one of these is reserved for "example" phone numbers, to be used in movies, for instance. They will never be a working number.
+1 (???) 555-01??
+1 (800) 555-????
+1 (822) 555-????
+1 (833) 555-????
+1 (844) 555-????
+1 (855) 555-????
+1 (866) 555-????
+1 (877) 555-????
+1 (888) 555-????
+1 (555) ???-????
Numbers matching the following pattern are usually fake because movies tend to stray outside of the officially reserved +1 (???) 555-01?? zone, but I read that some areas which have run out of other numbers have begun to use them. I've never seen it in real life.
+1 (???) 555-????
The following number is for directory assistance. It will never be a real user's phone number.
+1 (???) 555-1212
You may find that the last two examples are outside of the scope of phony_rails and should be handled by the application. But all other examples should return false when calling plausible_number?.
Thank you for your consideration!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: