-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for the weightedConfidence
missing value strategy
#276
Comments
Is this phenomenon related to discrete features? Because some features of this random forest model are discrete, is it related to the fact that all values cannot be obtained during training? |
As the exception message clearly states, the This attribute value has not been implemented, because I haven't come across any PMML files that use such as missing value handling strategy.
What AI platform is that? I'd be very much interested in seeing it, and any PMML documents exported from it. Once I have a "proof" that the |
Definitely "No".
Probably "Yes" - the Again, a sample PMML model with a sample sparse CSV input would be very helpful here. |
weightedConfidence
missing value strategy
Thank you a lot for your answers! My pmml file has several segments, in which are organized as follows: |
Repeating my earlier inquiry - what was the software that was used for training these random forest models? Does this software have a config option for toggling the "missing value handling" strategy? Perhaps there's a built-in option to change it from I'm personally aware of any open-source model training software that supports such a combination.
You can edit the The six possible values are listed here. The default value is |
@garasubin99 No reproducible example(s) means no fix. Can you use your AI Platform to train a RF classifier for the |
It's very kind of you to answer my questions! That really helps and inspired me a lot! The AI platform I used cannot be disclosed because it is confidential to my school. So I am very sorry that this platform cannot be disclosed. I will take your advice and give it a try. Words fail me when I want to express my thanks! |
Hi, I train a random forests model and it is generated into a pmml file. I used an AI platform to train it and it was evaluated normally at that environment. However, when I use JPMML to classify, different kinds of errors were thrown.
Like
I use several sets of features involved in this pmml and it was evaluated normally. However, there are many unexpected input parameter characteristics that cause the model to throw this error. In other words, some features will be scored correctly, while others will be scored incorrectly. Please tell me how to solve this situation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: