Skip to content

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-10-23 - 14:00 PT #499

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 task done
benjagm opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-10-23 - 14:00 PT #499

benjagm opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Working Meeting Identify working meetings

Comments

@benjagm
Copy link
Collaborator

benjagm commented Oct 17, 2023

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-10-23 - 14:00 PT

📺 See Recording

Go To Previous Meeting

Agenda:

Topic Owner Decision/NextStep
Review last call's action items [facilitator]
Reach agreement on the best way to close the discussion for the controversial blog post proposal. @benjagm The final decision is not to accept the PR because the blog is not the right channel for that type of message as stated by the blog guidelines. Instead, Github discussions or Slack seems the right place to share that type of content with the Community.

Action items:

  • Reject the PR of the controversial post because the blog is not the right channel for that type of message as stated by the blog guidelines.

Notes:

  • The team discussed whether or not to allow this type of critical posts on the JSON Schema blog . While we'd love to have different voices the main purpose of the blog is to promote JSON Schema adoption, and support the JSON Schema Community which is not the aligned with this post. Keeping in mind the purpose of the blog, we are open for different voices and opinions following the blog guidelines. Finally, they decided to politely reply and encourage further discussion in other channels like Github or Slack.
  • @benjagm suggested accelerating the creation of the code of conduct committee to evaluate violations and involve more people in content-related decisions.

Attendees

Account
@gregsdennis
@Relequestual
@jdesrosiers
@benjagm
@Julian
@jviotti
@benjagm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

benjagm commented Oct 24, 2023

As agreed the PR of the blog Post as been closed with this comment.

@benjagm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

benjagm commented Oct 29, 2023

Closing this issue as all tasks are completed. Thanks for your contributions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Working Meeting Identify working meetings
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant