You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
And so I figured, I'd implement the etag_value_for_quads for a quad pattern. I suppose we didn't quite intend that when we designed it, but it seems like a trivial extension, doesn't it?
The same would work for mtimes, I suppose.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think that when we originally designed etag_value_for_quads, it would take no arguments, and would return a token that can be used as an etag for the store as a whole, i.e. if any statement in the store changed, the token would change.
The idea is that we could provide something that more fine grained, that the token for a certain quad pattern would remain constant even though a statement matched by some other pattern have changed...
I found in my most recent experiment that there are some patterns I can compute specific etags for inexpensively, and some that I can't, see
https://github.com/kjetilk/p5-atteanx-store-filesystem/blob/master/lib/AtteanX/Store/Filesystem.pm#L196-L204
And so I figured, I'd implement the
etag_value_for_quads
for a quad pattern. I suppose we didn't quite intend that when we designed it, but it seems like a trivial extension, doesn't it?The same would work for
mtime
s, I suppose.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: