Skip to content

🔍 Research: Complete builder backend comparison matrix #14

@kingdonb

Description

@kingdonb

🎯 Objective

Complete the builder backend comparison matrix in BUILDER_BACKENDS.md to help developers choose the optimal build tool for their projects.

📋 Current State

The document exists as a stub with TODO sections that need research:

  • Performance benchmarks (Ko vs Kaniko build times)
  • Security audit comparisons
  • Image size differences
  • BuildKit optimization guides

🔧 Deliverables

1. Complete Performance Research

  • Ko vs Kaniko build time comparisons for Go applications
  • Image size differences (Ko distroless vs Kaniko standard)
  • BuildKit caching performance with different configurations
  • Spin WASM module size vs container image comparisons

2. Security Analysis

  • Kaniko security audit results and rootless execution benefits
  • BuildKit security modes (rootless vs privileged) comparison
  • Spin capability-based security model documentation
  • Ko distroless image security benefits

3. Use Case Guidelines

  • Decision matrix: "When to use which backend"
  • Real-world examples for each backend type
  • Migration guidance between backends
  • Performance optimization tips per backend

4. Technical Documentation

  • Configuration examples for each backend
  • Integration patterns with hephy-builder
  • Troubleshooting guides for common issues

📊 Research Sources

Ko Research

Kaniko Research

BuildKit Research

Spin Research

🎯 Success Criteria

  • Complete BUILDER_BACKENDS.md with no TODO sections
  • Actionable decision guide for backend selection
  • Performance data with real-world examples
  • Security comparison with specific recommendations

🔗 Related Work

This supports:

💡 Implementation Notes

This is a research task perfect for:

  • New contributors wanting to understand the ecosystem
  • Performance engineers interested in build optimization
  • Security-focused developers evaluating tool chains
  • Technical writers improving documentation

The research can be done incrementally - each backend can be completed independently.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions