From 83e29aae645d7b398ed78bb4779a57527f897a4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kristian Kraljic Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:56:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add more pros/cons for Ubisys capture device --- docs/supported-capture-devices.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/supported-capture-devices.md b/docs/supported-capture-devices.md index 6d1afbd..bc776f0 100644 --- a/docs/supported-capture-devices.md +++ b/docs/supported-capture-devices.md @@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ This page lists supported / tested capture devices for the [`cap.js` tool](../RE | Manufacturer | Ubisys | | Homepage | https://www.ubisys.de/en/products/for-zigbee-product-developers/wireshark-usb-stick/ | | Price | ~236,81€ | -| Pros / Cons | Pros: Easy to set-up and configure / no tinkering required. Cons: Quite expensive. | +| Pros / Cons | Pros: Out of the box solution, easy to set-up and configure / no tinkering required. Cons: Quite expensive, requires kernel driver patching on Linux | Set-up according to [manufacturers instructions](https://www.ubisys.de/wp-content/uploads/ubisys-ieee802154-wireshark-manual.pdf). Only challenge was that when patching the `rndis_host.c` driver on Debian 12 "Bookworm", some `OID_*` constants in the driver have been renamed to `RNDIS_OID_*` instead, which had to be manually renamed in order for the new kernel package to compile.