Skip to content

[Footer] Site feature: Layer5 Service Status #524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
leecalcote opened this issue May 3, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #527
Open

[Footer] Site feature: Layer5 Service Status #524

leecalcote opened this issue May 3, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #527
Assignees
Labels
framework/hugo good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature language/css language/html language/javascript Javascript related

Comments

@leecalcote
Copy link
Member

Current Behavior

The layer5.io site’s footer has a service status indicator.

Image

Desired Behavior

Ideally, the same service status indicator is also displayed in the documentation site footer.

Implementation

Copy implementation of layer5.io.

Acceptance Tests

Mockups


Contributor Guide and Resources

@leecalcote leecalcote added framework/hugo good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature language/css language/html language/javascript Javascript related labels May 3, 2025
@lumenCodes
Copy link

Hello @leecalcote please can I take this up?

@leecalcote
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @lumenCodes. That would be great.

@lumenCodes lumenCodes linked a pull request May 3, 2025 that will close this issue
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
framework/hugo good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed kind/enhancement Improvement in current feature language/css language/html language/javascript Javascript related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants