You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I haven't actually run the notebook but It would seem that when we call get_data() on our raw objects to get the numpy arrays, and then combine the arrays and create a new raw object, we are losing any annotation info:
For example, to preserve the Eyetracking Raw object annotations we would need to do something like et_annots = et_raw.annotations and then after creating our new combined object, do something like combined_raw.set_annotations(et_annots)
However, this may not work as expected out of the box... If the times of the new raw object diverged from the original eye-tracking raw, the annotations might be offset to some degree..
But I think it is important that we preserve annotations (because for example they provide info on blinks etc) - especially since our eye-tracking raw object has periods of NaN values and I want to make sure this isn't tripping up our routine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I haven't actually run the notebook but It would seem that when we call
get_data()
on our raw objects to get the numpy arrays, and then combine the arrays and create a new raw object, we are losing any annotation info:q1k_eeget_init/q1k_sync_tools.py
Lines 373 to 379 in ddd2f75
For example, to preserve the Eyetracking Raw object annotations we would need to do something like
et_annots = et_raw.annotations
and then after creating our new combined object, do something likecombined_raw.set_annotations(et_annots)
However, this may not work as expected out of the box... If the times of the new raw object diverged from the original eye-tracking raw, the annotations might be offset to some degree..
But I think it is important that we preserve annotations (because for example they provide info on blinks etc) - especially since our eye-tracking raw object has periods of NaN values and I want to make sure this isn't tripping up our routine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: