Skip to content

[server][dvc] minor fix: change the status change log format #10136

[server][dvc] minor fix: change the status change log format

[server][dvc] minor fix: change the status change log format #10136

Triggered via pull request February 13, 2026 00:39
Status Success
Total duration 12m 36s
Artifacts 19
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
11s
ValidateGradleWrapper
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
0s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsFailureAlert
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

8 errors
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Memory allocated is negative! memoryAllocatedBeforeInstantiations: 2418475368; memoryAllocatedAfterInstantiations: 2414443880; memoryAllocatedByInstantiations: -4031488; 3 attempts left.
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement: internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L49
java.lang.AssertionError: Memory allocated is negative! memoryAllocatedBeforeInstantiations: 2418475368; memoryAllocatedAfterInstantiations: 2414443880; memoryAllocatedByInstantiations: -4031488; 3 attempts left.
SITWithSAwarePWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResetPartition[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithSAwarePWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: abstractStorageEngine.put( 1, [(byte) 0x01, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x66, (byte) 0x66, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x30, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x37], java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=17 cap=17] ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.put(AbstractStorageEngine.java:478) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:39)
SITWithSAwarePWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testResetPartition[1](AA_OFF): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithSAwarePWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations: abstractStorageEngine.put( 1, [(byte) 0x01, (byte) 0x4B, (byte) 0x65, (byte) 0x79, (byte) 0x46, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x50, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x72, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x74, (byte) 0x69, (byte) 0x6F, (byte) 0x6E, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x38, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x37, (byte) 0x31, (byte) 0x39, (byte) 0x66, (byte) 0x66, (byte) 0x5F, (byte) 0x63, (byte) 0x64, (byte) 0x62, (byte) 0x32, (byte) 0x30, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x61, (byte) 0x37], java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0 lim=17 cap=17] ); Wanted 2 times: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.store.AbstractStorageEngine.put(AbstractStorageEngine.java:478) But was 1 time: -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.DeepCopyStorageEngine.put(DeepCopyStorageEngine.java:39)
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[1](UNSORTED, AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, <Capturing argument>, "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27) However, there were exactly 852 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{2} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{3} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{4} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{5} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{6} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{7} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{8} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{9} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{10} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{11} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{12} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{13} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{14} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{15} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{16} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$re
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testDataValidationCheckPointing[1](UNSORTED, AA_ON): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: logNotifier.completed( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, <Capturing argument>, "STANDBY" ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.notifier.LogNotifier.completed(LogNotifier.java:27) However, there were exactly 852 interactions with this mock: logNotifier.started( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1 ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportStarted$1(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:117) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{2} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{3} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{4} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{5} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{6} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{7} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{8} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{9} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{10} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{11} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{12} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{13} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{14} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{15} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$reportProgress$10(IngestionNotificationDispatcher.java:214) logNotifier.progress( "TestTopic_48d00cca65_bf27b86d_v1", 1, InMemoryPubSubPosition{16} ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.IngestionNotificationDispatcher.lambda$re
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:523) However, there were exactly 2091 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 5.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.109927d, 1770943583643L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1450) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1455) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 3.620795d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.07446900000000001d, 1770943583649L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1450) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1455) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2784) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.061054d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.046097d, 1770943583662L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1450) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1455) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.053009d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.047189d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false): clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed( <any long> ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:523) However, there were exactly 2091 interactions with this mock: hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 5.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.109927d, 1770943583643L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1450) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1455) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 3.620795d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.07446900000000001d, 1770943583649L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1450) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1455) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2784) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.061054d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency( 0.046097d, 1770943583662L ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1450) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1455) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.053009d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency( 0.0d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:2156) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency( 0.047189d ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:783) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed( NaNd ); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1767) hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed(); -> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size Digest
StaticAnalysis
951 KB
sha256:d5e79c11641313de627afafa4b263159055893d79631f6b4a9ed5327b6c98b41
clients-jdk11
3.19 MB
sha256:fb4c8b7d533918d86a51f90425374af5de54fff02636745fdcaf6b0ceec6acbd
clients-jdk17
3.2 MB
sha256:fe87956b50010e7d2ceee16f73a5d472e5702b6ec78cee0102cd4ad1f5ef3fd6
clients-jdk8
3.14 MB
sha256:a5b8438643e1efcc3ac452a20a0c9cce1fae5d2347abfa0a0aa0f88642a9bb32
controller-jdk11
1.97 MB
sha256:b2ebc1a88fc2a1a102e622e562bbcf692da88d816cace0015e4ec6a34ccf0452
controller-jdk17
1.97 MB
sha256:68b1de480f0c94dfdbd4567e901db65f83f08174aaae6628c901de492e063fdc
controller-jdk8
1.96 MB
sha256:cbee00536a00db1b15d5b6449abf970ba93412cccd415e4c5b7846461c90ee9b
integrations-jdk11
535 KB
sha256:eb8c57184f7adeddcbc53a6dcdca87b22a02c2341b356f2ad7f8629bfb8d8dd6
integrations-jdk17
543 KB
sha256:a27958be7284c7ab9b4ab6074e14a8ccc240376f8d6c4520995b1481f3a70bf6
integrations-jdk8
526 KB
sha256:50433d5d2ade67996111a1588b0fe30b7b14f2927fdae18794d2c3d04c27f2b0
internal-jdk11
4.23 MB
sha256:61aa8c61f53a307223e13e5cd295446fb186dd63331f4bebc263648182b98aff
internal-jdk17
4.25 MB
sha256:b57a13a3e914e6bbfabbd1b53e743b3325c92faebfc4b62e12efb2c06f9d6280
internal-jdk8
4.22 MB
sha256:81fc1d14ebf45851936da1c0fc82d35f40de2f0a2a024f26c1f62fab084451a5
router-jdk11
758 KB
sha256:ffe03dfede5a04bca4a3e3b6109eb47897b7771312346488300780253ea20b39
router-jdk17
753 KB
sha256:9198215eda2c9fe303493601238f98b7ef5f5158cff85eaa60b9a1a59e3ef0a6
router-jdk8
741 KB
sha256:e5c5f236ce0df54af71f8468e75693f75f57e8f5bf5f20d5e2e2f3361ada9d9e
server-jdk11
10.6 MB
sha256:24789cb134d8f584addf7284b72536bf4d5f4dc1da353c0e721943ae5ce3328f
server-jdk17
10.8 MB
sha256:832b7df696934de5c68bbbb91c750573fe59da4442b730de85ce811699373577
server-jdk8
10.4 MB
sha256:61aafb24a1ec1423f7f7fbf3badf0ab78608a3cb67412df35904dce8b63e47a2