Version history drop down is poorly formated

[rneher]

(Note sure whether this is a duplicate)

We should make this drop down as least as wide to accommodate the accession and the terms

https://pathoplexus.org/seq/PP_0011CQ4.2

@fhennig, could you look into that?

[fhennig]

I've put it on the list!

Additional context here: https://loculus.slack.com/archives/C05G172HL6L/p1740403366723609

[theosanderson]

Also, I would prefer not to have the "Revised" on the original, because really what we mean here is "Old version", the revision is version 2. I would maybe only show "Latest version" and have empty string otherwise.

or 'previous version' in light grey, latest version as is without ()

(we can break this out into a new issue later potentially)
We have some complex logic atm that IIRC assigns all old versions as either "Revised" or "Revoked". I've always been against that because IMO the revision/revocation should be associated with the new version. IMO we could do as Richard says above and simply call old versions "Previous version", in gray.