Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Processing Landsat collection 1 #64

Open
mabdelrazek opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Processing Landsat collection 1 #64

mabdelrazek opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@mabdelrazek
Copy link

Are there any plans to add processing Landsat collection 1?

Best,
Mo

@loicdtx
Copy link
Owner

loicdtx commented Mar 28, 2017

Are you referring to MSS ?

@loicdtx
Copy link
Owner

loicdtx commented Mar 28, 2017

Sorry, I had to catch up with the Landsat news, long time I hadn't done it; now I understand what you're asking :)

So yes, as it looks like the new standard we'll try to make the package able to handle this new collection.

@mabdelrazek
Copy link
Author

I appreciate that 👍 !

USGS has already reprocessed all Landsat 4, 5 and 7 according to the new standard, and currently they are working on Landsat 8. An admirable step to improve Landsat time series analysis.

I hope that applying bfastSpatial on Landsat collection 1 will yield even better results :D

@loicdtx loicdtx assigned loicdtx and unassigned loicdtx Apr 11, 2017
@loicdtx
Copy link
Owner

loicdtx commented Apr 11, 2017

ESPA has already stopped pre-collection processing, I'll work on the changes required in the coming days.

@bendv
Copy link
Collaborator

bendv commented Apr 12, 2017 via email

@loicdtx
Copy link
Owner

loicdtx commented Apr 14, 2017

Great @bendv , there are a few things on my wishlist for bfastSpatial. I don't have my notes with me right now, but that includes more or less:

Feel free to help with any of these tasks, suggest other improvements or provide code reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants