Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comprehensive content review #171

Open
mark-wiemer opened this issue Feb 2, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Comprehensive content review #171

mark-wiemer opened this issue Feb 2, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@mark-wiemer
Copy link
Contributor

We've imported the content, now let's make sure it's quality. This issue is for tracking general cleanup work to the entire site.

  1. Change lists to tables where appropriate (ref https://docs.luanti.org/server/commands/)
  2. Fix typos (ref Add spell-checker #83)
  3. Integrate links into prose instead of "click here for more info" (more accessible, more usable)
  4. Other quick reviews?

Pages reviewed:

  • (todo)
@appgurueu
Copy link
Contributor

I agree that much of the content will need to be reviewed and improved. First after the big wiki imports, and after that continuously as new engine versions are released.

But lists/tables, typos, links aren't all that important.

What's much more important is the content and the structure, and I think these are the major issues we should be focusing on. For example the "using Blender" article covers many things which should be in the "models" article (which is currently a stub), and even worse, the "using Blender" article is outdated and focuses on .b3d and .x.

More generally, our structure is currently a mess, with way too many things at the flat top level; categorization is on the short term roadmap.

@wsor4035
Copy link
Collaborator

wsor4035 commented Feb 7, 2025

probably should have a checkmark list of all the pages in the top level so we know whats done/not done rather than this issue staying open forever? unless someone else has a better idea?

@mark-wiemer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I'm focusing on #181 now and after that I'll look at this one (or #83 , or #84 , or #141 improvements...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants