You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: CONTRIBUTING.md
+4-4
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ can only act retroactive on changes of AWS services. Otherwise, it would be a fu
11
11
12
12
If a resource is not yet supported by *aws-nuke*, you have two options to resolve this:
13
13
14
-
* File [an issue](https://github.com/rebuy-de/aws-nuke/issues/new) and describe which resource is missing. This way someone can take care of it.
14
+
* File [an issue](https://github.com/ekristen/aws-nuke/issues/new) and describe which resource is missing. This way someone can take care of it.
15
15
* Add the resource yourself and open a Pull Request. Please follow the guidelines below to see how to create
16
16
such a resource.
17
17
@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@ Please check the following points before creating a bug issue:
26
26
there are a lot of dependency errors in the first one. The iterations are separated by lines starting with
27
27
`Removal requested:` and only the errors in the last block indicate actual errors.
28
28
29
-
File [an issue](https://github.com/rebuy-de/aws-nuke/issues/new) and describe as accurately as possible how to generate the resource on AWS that cause the
29
+
File [an issue](https://github.com/ekristen/aws-nuke/issues/new) and describe as accurately as possible how to generate the resource on AWS that cause the
30
30
errors in *aws-nuke*. Ideally this is provided in a reproducible way like a Terraform template or AWS CLI commands.
31
31
32
32
### I Have Ideas to Improve *aws-nuke*
33
33
34
34
You should take these steps if you have an idea how to improve *aws-nuke*:
35
35
36
-
1. Check the [issues page](https://github.com/rebuy-de/aws-nuke/issues), whether someone already had the same or a similar idea.
37
-
2. Also check the [closed issues](https://github.com/rebuy-de/aws-nuke/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue), because this might have already been implemented, but not yet released. Also,
36
+
1. Check the [issues page](https://github.com/ekristen/aws-nuke/issues), whether someone already had the same or a similar idea.
37
+
2. Also check the [closed issues](https://github.com/ekristen/aws-nuke/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue), because this might have already been implemented, but not yet released. Also,
38
38
the idea might not be viable for obvious reasons.
39
39
3. Join the discussion, if there is already a related issue. If this is not the case, open a new issue and describe
40
40
your idea. Afterward, we can discuss this idea and form a proposal.
0 commit comments