Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Azure resource configuration review using Maester? #707

Open
ville87 opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Question: Azure resource configuration review using Maester? #707

ville87 opened this issue Feb 28, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@ville87
Copy link

ville87 commented Feb 28, 2025

Is there any plan / idea that Maester could also be used to review Azure resource configurations? (e.g. based on "CIS Microsoft Azure Foundation Benchmark")
Since these have to be reviewed via Azure Resource Manager API, and are not (yet?) supported via MS Graph API, I'm not sure if this is something which the creators of Maester actually would want to include in Maester?

In our company we are currently discussing about doing future Entra ID / M365 / Azure Resource reviews with one single tool (Azure resources are currently being done with an in-house developed script) so there is the idea to add all Azure Resource testcases as pester tests to Maester...
That's why I'd like to hear if there has been already thoughts/discussions about this on your side?

@soulemike
Copy link
Contributor

There is no technical limitation, and Azure as a service is already added to the module for support. Though I am unaware of anyone working on this currently.

Example of interacting with ARM endpoints, https://github.com/maester365/maester/blob/main/powershell/public/cisa/entra/Test-MtCisaDiagnosticSettings.ps1

@maester365 maester365 locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 28, 2025
@soulemike soulemike converted this issue into a discussion Feb 28, 2025
@soulemike soulemike reopened this Feb 28, 2025
@soulemike soulemike converted this issue into a discussion Feb 28, 2025
@soulemike soulemike reopened this Feb 28, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants