From 4c6af415cb9b07f77d151af3a481d6a63f667d23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Gurney Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:15:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix incorrect comment for hasnext method test case. Co-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <74676073+sgilmore10@users.noreply.github.com> --- matlab/test/arrow/io/ipc/tRecordBatchStreamReader.m | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/matlab/test/arrow/io/ipc/tRecordBatchStreamReader.m b/matlab/test/arrow/io/ipc/tRecordBatchStreamReader.m index f250c16c2801e..1fa359a87f0e9 100644 --- a/matlab/test/arrow/io/ipc/tRecordBatchStreamReader.m +++ b/matlab/test/arrow/io/ipc/tRecordBatchStreamReader.m @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ function HasNext(testCase, RecordBatchReadFcn) testCase.verifyEqual(iterations, 0); reader = arrow.io.ipc.RecordBatchStreamReader(testCase.OneBatchStreamFile); - % hasnext should return true 0 times for a 1 batch file. + % hasnext should return true 1 time for a 1 batch file. iterations = 0; while reader.hasnext() RecordBatchReadFcn(reader);