Skip to content

Conversation

@NishanthSanjeevi
Copy link
Contributor

@NishanthSanjeevi NishanthSanjeevi commented Nov 19, 2025

Description

Fix the retry logic in the UFS device detection APIs

  • Impacts functionality?
  • Impacts security?
  • Breaking change?
  • Includes tests?
  • Includes documentation?

How This Was Tested

Tested on physical Hardware

Integration Instructions

N/A

@NishanthSanjeevi NishanthSanjeevi changed the title Fix retry in UFS device detection APIs Fix retry logic in UFS device detection APIs Nov 19, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release/202502@62fa859). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             release/202502    #1577   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?    1.55%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?      636           
  Lines                     ?   233989           
  Branches                  ?      370           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?     3649           
  Misses                    ?   230327           
  Partials                  ?       13           
Flag Coverage Δ
MdeModulePkg 1.55% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@makubacki makubacki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be preferable to have more granular error codes, but looking through the UFS code, they're all mixed up, so this seems reasonable.

@makubacki
Copy link
Member

Also, please create a PR in edk2 (without the MU_CHANGE tags). We don't need to wait on it to merge this.

@makubacki makubacki requested a review from os-d November 19, 2025 15:31
@makubacki
Copy link
Member

@NishanthSanjeevi, please push the uncrustify update when you get a chance. I've set automerge so it will merge when that's done.

@makubacki makubacki enabled auto-merge (squash) November 19, 2025 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants