You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently, I started my superconductivity calculations with sctk. Before this, I often used QE and EPW for superconductivity calculations and I repeated the examples for Al and MgB2 in the sctk folder.
For my case, I have finished the superconducting calculations via analytically solving the Allen-Dynes-modified McMillan formula. Everything is going well and there is no imaginary frequency (occupations=gauss & deguass=0.05). When it comes to the SCDFT (or sctk), the code requires the occupations=tetrahedra_opt. I changed occupations from gauss into tetrahedra_opt, and I found that there are some imaginary frequency in the matdyn files.
I have read the PRB 89, 094515 (2014) and found the occupations=tetrahedra_opt can reduce the number k or q points, but the frequency is also descreasing significantly (Fig 5 in PRB 89, 094515 (2014) ).
It is too bad for me. Would you like to share me some suggestions kindly to fix the imaginary frequency induced by the different occupations? I have resubmitted the JOB with denser k/q-points mesh, but the imaginary is robust existted.
Looking forward to your reply. Ang comments and suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks and Regards,
Jianguo Si
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BTW,if I ignore the existence of imaginary frequency, the calculated Tc (91.72 K) is very closed to the AD-McMillan one (~91.4 K). But the gap is too small (0.35129E-05) and the lambda it too big (0.75456E+01).
Dear Dr. Kawamura,
Recently, I started my superconductivity calculations with sctk. Before this, I often used QE and EPW for superconductivity calculations and I repeated the examples for Al and MgB2 in the sctk folder.
For my case, I have finished the superconducting calculations via analytically solving the Allen-Dynes-modified McMillan formula. Everything is going well and there is no imaginary frequency (occupations=gauss & deguass=0.05). When it comes to the SCDFT (or sctk), the code requires the occupations=tetrahedra_opt. I changed occupations from gauss into tetrahedra_opt, and I found that there are some imaginary frequency in the matdyn files.
I have read the PRB 89, 094515 (2014) and found the occupations=tetrahedra_opt can reduce the number k or q points, but the frequency is also descreasing significantly (Fig 5 in PRB 89, 094515 (2014) ).
It is too bad for me. Would you like to share me some suggestions kindly to fix the imaginary frequency induced by the different occupations? I have resubmitted the JOB with denser k/q-points mesh, but the imaginary is robust existted.
Looking forward to your reply. Ang comments and suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks and Regards,
Jianguo Si
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: