Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to fix the difference of phonon frequency calculated with different occupations? #16

Open
jgSi1113 opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jgSi1113
Copy link

Dear Dr. Kawamura,

Recently, I started my superconductivity calculations with sctk. Before this, I often used QE and EPW for superconductivity calculations and I repeated the examples for Al and MgB2 in the sctk folder.

For my case, I have finished the superconducting calculations via analytically solving the Allen-Dynes-modified McMillan formula. Everything is going well and there is no imaginary frequency (occupations=gauss & deguass=0.05). When it comes to the SCDFT (or sctk), the code requires the occupations=tetrahedra_opt. I changed occupations from gauss into tetrahedra_opt, and I found that there are some imaginary frequency in the matdyn files.

I have read the PRB 89, 094515 (2014) and found the occupations=tetrahedra_opt can reduce the number k or q points, but the frequency is also descreasing significantly (Fig 5 in PRB 89, 094515 (2014) ).

It is too bad for me. Would you like to share me some suggestions kindly to fix the imaginary frequency induced by the different occupations? I have resubmitted the JOB with denser k/q-points mesh, but the imaginary is robust existted.

Looking forward to your reply. Ang comments and suggestions are welcomed.

Thanks and Regards,
Jianguo Si

@jgSi1113
Copy link
Author

BTW,if I ignore the existence of imaginary frequency, the calculated Tc (91.72 K) is very closed to the AD-McMillan one (~91.4 K). But the gap is too small (0.35129E-05) and the lambda it too big (0.75456E+01).

Waiting for you kindly reply.

(The e-mail can not connect you correctly. )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant