You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
I don't have the full overview of the package but creating this as reminder and as a way to start the discussing.
I think we should consider if we could somehow hide away the optional part of the validator. It could be as simple as defaulting to accept nil values unless one explicitly specifies how to handle nil values using the .allowingNils.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I don't have the full overview of the package but creating this as reminder and as a way to start the discussing.
I think we should consider if we could somehow hide away the optional part of the validator. It could be as simple as defaulting to accept
nil
values unless one explicitly specifies how to handlenil
values using the.allowingNils
.Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: