-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathavgres.tex
42 lines (40 loc) · 2.2 KB
/
avgres.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
In this section we show the average shape measurement
bias results on a representative DES lensing catalog of
all sources with SNR $>$ 20. Most previous weak lensing studies
rejected all objects below some SNR threshold, but the
depth chosen varies as it is determined by both the capabilities
of the lensing pipeline used and the type of lensing analysis. In
the CFHTLenS survey, all objects were rejected that were
measured as i'(AB) $<$ 24.7, or a SNR limit of around 10
\citep{cfhtls}. This limit was imposed for the CFHTLenS
catalog as it was the depth determined at which the
photometric redshifts and shape measurements were too
poorly measured \citep{Hild}. For the CSTEP project
we chose objects with SNR $>$ 20 for the representative DES
lensing catalog. This is a conservative choice, and
with additional lensing pipeline development a lower
SNR threshold could be chosen for the final DES
lensing catalog. \green{it would be great to compare this to the SNR cuts in Jarvis+2015, although these were of course made on a different SNR definition}\\
The average shape measurement bias on all images
in the CSTEP simulations for galaxies SNR $>$ 20
is shown in Figure \ref{fig:QMC}.
\begin{figure}
\centering % this centres figure in column
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig/QMC_main_f.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig/MC_main_f.pdf}
\caption{Average shape measurement bias
as measured on all images for galaxies with SNR $>$ 20. The
top panel shows the shape measurement bias $q$,$m$ as measured using
a $q$,$m$,$c$ fit. The bottom panel shows the shape measurement bias
$m$,$c$ as measured using a $m$,$c$ fit.}
\label{fig:QMC}
\end{figure}
Three of the lensing pipelines (I3, DE, KM) also competed in the GREAT10 challenge.
%The comparison between the GREAT10 and CSTEP results is shown in
%Figure \ref{fig:gt10}.
The results are roughly consistent between
the two challenges for I3 and KM, showing that both pipelines are
robust, and demonstrate similar levels of shape measurement bias
for a wide variety of sources and PSF types. Both I3 and KM are
among the best performing lensing pipelines for both CSTEP and
GREAT10. \green{this leaves the reader to wonder what is the case with DE}