From 88b6228d628ac8a4d188251f5dab9322b5534b9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christophe Prud'homme Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 11:08:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed the compilation: \cite is not supported in the \caption @chrisgeo17 I use the cleveref package which allows to have a systematic way of refererring to figures, tables, section @palliez @chrisgeo17 could you check that it is ok for you ? --- software/cgal/WP1/WP1.tex | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/software/cgal/WP1/WP1.tex b/software/cgal/WP1/WP1.tex index c0e9ce3..e681a32 100644 --- a/software/cgal/WP1/WP1.tex +++ b/software/cgal/WP1/WP1.tex @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +%!TEX root = ../../../exa-ma-d7.1.tex \section{Software: CGAL} \label{sec:WP1:CGAL:software} @@ -150,7 +151,8 @@ \subsection{Initial Performance Metrics} \subsubsection{Benchmark \#1 - 3D Alpha Wrapping serial} -The 3D alpha wrapping does not offer parallelization at its current stage of development. We provide in Figure \ref{WP1::CGAL::aw3} the complexity analysis from \cite{portaneri_alpha_2022} on a single 3D model (fan model, available in GrabCad) and using a single thread. The plots shows that the computational time correlates well with the output mesh complexity (number of triangles). +The 3D alpha wrapping does not offer parallelization at its current stage of development. We provide in~\cref{WP1::CGAL::aw3} the complexity analysis from~\cite{portaneri_alpha_2022} on a single 3D model (fan model, available in GrabCad) and using a single thread. +The plots shows that the computational time correlates well with the output mesh complexity (number of triangles). \begin{figure}[htb] @@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ \subsubsection{Benchmark \#1 - 3D Alpha Wrapping serial} \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{graphics/cgal/fan.png} \caption{Output complexity and time against alpha/offset parameters. \textbf{Top:} Input fan model, and few output meshes shown for increasing alpha parameter. \textbf{Middle top:} Complexity of the output mesh in number of triangle -facets. Middle bottom: Computational time in ms. \textbf{Bottom:} Computational time against complexity of the output mesh. Each dot corresponds to one above combination of alpha/offset parameters. Figure taken from \cite{portaneri_alpha_2022}.} +facets. Middle bottom: Computational time in ms. \textbf{Bottom:} Computational time against complexity of the output mesh. Each dot corresponds to one above combination of alpha/offset parameters.} \label{WP1::CGAL::aw3} \end{figure} @@ -167,7 +169,7 @@ \subsubsection{Benchmark \#1 - 3D Alpha Wrapping serial} \subsubsection{Benchmark \#2 - 3D Mesh Generation parallel} -The speed-up charts in Figure \ref{WP1::CGAL::mg3parallel} are generated using the parallel version of the 3D meshing algorithm and were obtained from the 3D mesh generation reference manual \cite{alliez_3d_2024}. +The speed-up charts in~\cref{WP1::CGAL::mg3parallel} are generated using the parallel version of the 3D meshing algorithm and were obtained from the 3D mesh generation reference manual \cite{alliez_3d_2024}. The machine used is a PC running Windows 7 64-bits with two 6-core Intel Xeon CPU X5660 clocked at 2.80 GHz with 32GB of RAM. The program has been compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2012, in Release mode. The models used for this benchmark are publicly available in the CGAL Git repository, specifically in the 'demo' folder. @@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ \subsubsection{Benchmark \#2 - 3D Mesh Generation parallel} \begin{figure}[htb] \centering \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{graphics/cgal/refinement_speedup.png} - \caption{Facet refinement speed-up (left) and cell refinement speed-up (right), compared to the sequential version of the algorithm. Figure taken from \cite{alliez_3d_2024}.} + \caption{Facet refinement speed-up (left) and cell refinement speed-up (right), compared to the sequential version of the algorithm.} \label{WP1::CGAL::mg3parallel} \end{figure}