Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Batch process for missing seasonpacks #125

Open
shzhng opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] Batch process for missing seasonpacks #125

shzhng opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Area: API Related to the API Area: Release Processing Related to release processing Priority: Medium Affects functionality in a rather serious way Status: Investigating Looking in to it Type: Enhancement Improvement of the current situation
Milestone

Comments

@shzhng
Copy link

shzhng commented Aug 5, 2024

Description

First of all, thank you @nuxencs for making this tool. Is there a way to have this go back and process previously downloaded episodes and match to existing seasonpacks (perhaps by searching the indexer)? Right now it seems like it can only react to seasonpacks announced in real-time by autobrr. I have a bunch of episodes that I previously missed the seasonpack for, and would love to go back and clean that up retroactively without having to hand wire hardlinks manually.

This would probably look something a bit like cross-seed's batch search on a cadence

Alternatives

No response

Screenshots

No response

Additional Context

No response

@shzhng shzhng changed the title [Feature Request] [Feature Request] Batch process for missing seasonpacks Aug 5, 2024
@nuxencs nuxencs added Area: API Related to the API Type: Enhancement Improvement of the current situation Priority: Medium Affects functionality in a rather serious way Status: Investigating Looking in to it Area: Release Processing Related to release processing labels Aug 5, 2024
@nuxencs
Copy link
Owner

nuxencs commented Aug 5, 2024

Thanks for the feature request, this sounds like a reasonable feature to implement, but I would probably need to do some more research to realize this. I'll put it on my todo-list, but no promises here 😅

@nuxencs nuxencs added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: API Related to the API Area: Release Processing Related to release processing Priority: Medium Affects functionality in a rather serious way Status: Investigating Looking in to it Type: Enhancement Improvement of the current situation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants