You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CL term
non-terminally differentiated cell (CL:0000055) and terminally differentiated osteoblast (CL:0001039)
Suggested revision of class hierarchy
Currently, "non-terminally differentiated cell" (CL:0000055) is an ancestor of "terminally differentiated osteoblast" (CL:0001039), which seems incorrect to me.
I think the issue is osteoblast (CL:0000062) isa Subclass of "non-terminally differentiated cell", even though there is a "non-terminally differentiated osteoblast" child of osteoblast. I'm not sure whether these 2 children of "osteoblast" should be deleted or the connection between "osteoblast" and "non-terminally differentiated cell" should be deleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I favor option 2, as cell differentiation is a lot more complicated than previously appreciated. Mature naive T cells might be considered fully differentiated, but clearly can undergo additional paths of differentiation once activated. Other cell types can dedifferentiate under the right conditions.
CL term
non-terminally differentiated cell (CL:0000055) and terminally differentiated osteoblast (CL:0001039)
Suggested revision of class hierarchy
Currently, "non-terminally differentiated cell" (CL:0000055) is an ancestor of "terminally differentiated osteoblast" (CL:0001039), which seems incorrect to me.
I think the issue is osteoblast (CL:0000062) isa Subclass of "non-terminally differentiated cell", even though there is a "non-terminally differentiated osteoblast" child of osteoblast. I'm not sure whether these 2 children of "osteoblast" should be deleted or the connection between "osteoblast" and "non-terminally differentiated cell" should be deleted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: