Skip to content

Commit 54b1032

Browse files
committed
Create 2019-08-21UserTenantsRightsWorkgroupCall.md
1 parent aab86df commit 54b1032

File tree

1 file changed

+40
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+40
-0
lines changed
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
1+
# Protocol
2+
3+
**Attendees:** Philipp, Hansjörg, Hans
4+
5+
# Housekeeping
6+
- Please add more use cases [-> google doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B_4wSOBe-_Xbws6fjlk9s0xV1F6zA5BmXvNmRCulr_s/edit?usp=sharing)
7+
8+
# Topics
9+
**Tenant/User (T/U) in general**
10+
1. investigated references and concepts already discussed or developed within OIH, found a few references
11+
* [MetaModel](../MasterDataModels/MetaModel.md)
12+
* [OihMessage](https://github.com/openintegrationhub/Data-and-Domain-Models/blob/oihHeader/MasterDataModels/Assets/OihMessage.svg)
13+
2. IAM service organizes users as members of distinct tenants
14+
* [OIH IAM Service](https://github.com/openintegrationhub/openintegrationhub/tree/master/services/iam)
15+
16+
First conclusions
17+
- T/U Rarely referenced nor specified in a generic way
18+
- IAM implements simple T/U to authorize account management
19+
- -> design T/U Data Model to equalize existing concepts
20+
21+
**Rights & Permissions**
22+
23+
Discussed following scenarios
24+
25+
1.
26+
- Service A has access management
27+
- Service B spares access control, all data is public
28+
- Sensitive data will be transferred from A to B and is henceforth public
29+
2.
30+
- Organization provides a pipeline to transfer data from Service A to Service B
31+
- Members with access to flow will transfer data without holding individual rights
32+
33+
Consequential issues
34+
- Do we have to find intersections between different access rights and derive suitable permissions? Optional or mandatory?
35+
- Could we store tokens for different users, flows, tenants - delegate access management to every service involved?
36+
37+
38+
39+
## Next Steps
40+
- Further discussion on topics

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)