Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New blog post about unified observability with opensearch #3150

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jkowall
Copy link
Contributor

@jkowall jkowall commented Aug 7, 2024

Description

Adding new blog around unified observability

Explore how OpenSearch offers a unified observability solution for platform teams, addressing challenges of open-source tools by integrating with CNCF projects like Prometheus, Grafana, and Jaeger. Learn about the strategic advantages of OpenSearch in managing observability data, and get a preview of an in-depth demo at OpenSearchCon, showcasing its role in enhancing developer platforms.

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the BSD-3-Clause License.

@jkowall
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkowall commented Aug 29, 2024

Please process my blog, it's been in queue for 3 weeks and other blogs are going out. This is timely with the conference coming up. Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor

@anirudha anirudha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added comment/ thanks

@jkowall
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkowall commented Sep 12, 2024

How can we get this published?

@krisfreedain
Copy link
Member

@pajuric @natebower - do we know if this is going into editorial review soon? It need to be published for @jkowall before OpenSearchCon - thanks!

@natebower
Copy link
Collaborator

@pajuric @natebower - do we know if this is going into editorial review soon? It need to be published for @jkowall before OpenSearchCon - thanks!

@krisfreedain I haven't received a request for this one yet, but I'm happy to review it either tomorrow or (more likely) Monday.

@jkowall
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkowall commented Sep 14, 2024

@krisfreedain I haven't received a request for this one yet, but I'm happy to review it either tomorrow or (more likely) Monday.

How does one open a request?

@pajuric
Copy link

pajuric commented Sep 14, 2024

@brijos - Please advise if we're able to move this forward or whether you have other suggested edits as discussed.

@brijos
Copy link
Contributor

brijos commented Sep 16, 2024

Hey Jonah, happy to chat. First of all sorry for the late feedback. I reviewed the proposed blog late last week and I don't see it diving deep to qualify as a technical blog. The blog reads like the intro to your OpenSearch talk instead of being a technical blog post. Please add more substance such as interesting ways to correlate data between Prometheus metrics and Jaeger traces without compromising what will be an awesome talk next week at OpenSearch Con.

@jkowall
Copy link
Contributor Author

jkowall commented Sep 16, 2024

I appreciate your feedback on the blog post. Unfortunately, given the current timeline, the fact that it needs to be published this week, I'm unable to incorporate additional technical details. I plan to share the post on LinkedIn as it stands if it's not going to be posted on the OpenSearch blog.

I understand the importance of timely feedback, and I hope we can streamline the review process for future content to ensure it aligns with expectations and deadlines. This was very frustrating versus other places where I contribute content.

I'll agree to disagree as we get a lot of questions at Kubecon about the use of different observability tools to handle different observability signals between Jaeger, Prometheus, and OpenSearch. If you do not want to publish things which answer the questions for the typical user then I don't understand what is relevant for the blog.

@jkowall jkowall closed this Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants